
Eventually I will read Tyler Hamilton and Daniel Coyle's recent tell-all
book
about the dark side of professional cycling But before I do that, I decided to go back and pick up the original expose of the peloton, Paul Kimmage’s
Rough Ride. First
published in 1990, it describes the “unglamorous” life of a
domestique—routine doping, race buying,
and politicking in the peloton—in a way no one had dared to do before. Kimmage
took a lot of heat for the book. The title could easily refer to the book’s reception
in the cycling community; Kimmage lost friends, made enemies, and earned a
reputation as a code-breaking renegade, even a pariah. He once even described
himself as the “Salman Rushdie of the cycling world,” such was the unofficial
fatwa cast over him by his book.
Although Kimmage quit racing in 1989, he’s remained a presence on the pro scene through his journalism in the UK. Well,
presence isn’t really the right word for what many cycling insiders considered Kimmage to be. More like supreme shit-disturber, whistle-blower, PED alarmist, Armstrong vilifier (see his famous exchange with Armstrong, regarding Kimmage’s assertion that Lance was a
“cancer” on the cycling body), and relentless critic of the UCI. (He’s now suing the UCI, in fact, just for something to do, it seems, now that the Armstrong crusade is winding down. He seems to
need to be in take-down mode.)
Given the recent events vis-a-vis Armstrong and Hamilton, it seemed right just
now to go back and see just how rough the ride really was for Kimmage.