Phoenix sucks for cycling. At least that’s what Val, a
one-time Tucsonan, had told me (many times, in fact), and that’s what I had
heard from more than one contributor to on-line forums discussing Arizona’s
version of the great cycling debate: Phoenix vs. Tucson—which is better for
cycling? Phoenix, so goes the argument, is enormous, sprawling, freeway-laced,
concrete-filled, and generally not cycling friendly. Tucson, however, according
to loyalists, being a more manageable size, is easy to get across on a bike,
close to some great climbs, and home to a thriving bikey culture—in other
words, it is a fabulous cycling centre. Now that I’ve visited and cycled in
both cities, it’s time to weigh in with my two bits on who gets the nod in this
epic battle.
Last April I spent a week riding in Tucson with Val and Penn;
this past week I was in Phoenix with my family, and though I didn’t put in the
same kind of miles there as I did in Tucson, I got out for a ride most days. Now
I admit this comparison isn’t a fair fight. In Tucson, Penn and I had a savvy and
enthusiastic guide, Val, who knew the cycling scene inside and out, and who
took us to various funky corners of the city and its environs. I got to see
some of the best that Tucson has to offer cyclists. In Phoenix, meanwhile, I
was cycling on my own (except for a couple of family rides on the Scottsdale
greenbelt) and only explored the northeastern corner. Sure, I had done my
research and scoped out routes, but that’s a poor substitute for having a keen,
native guide. So, yes, I readily admit that I’m pretty much talking out of my
ass on this topic, given that a week isn’t
much time to make a thorough, fair assessment of each place. But hey, isn’t such
half-informed ass-speak the very stuff of the blogosphere?
I have fond memories of my cycling week in Tucson. The place
did feel like a big town rather than a major city, and it was surprisingly easy
to get across or out of town via bike-laned thoroughfares, with little freeway
canoodling required. We rode some memorable routes: over Gates Pass, up and
down Mount Lemmon, through a saguaro forest. But the memory of Tucson that
lingers most strongly in my mind is the Time Market. This funky store/café in
the university district is a hot spot of the Tucson cycling scene. It’s even
got a bike corral out front. Looking out the window, sipping our espresso, we saw
the full spectrum of the city’s diverse cycling culture whizz by: serious club
riders, commuting university students, recumbent dudes, cargo bikes, old
hippies (like the bare-chested, jean-wearing, long-haired dude we saw on a
$5000 bike) out for a leisurely spin.
Going to Phoenix this year, my expectations were low, based
on Val’s bias and what I’d read on-line. But where I stayed and rode, in
Fountain Hills and Scottsdale, the riding was actually pretty sweet. I saw lots
of generous bike lanes and smooth roads, stumbled onto some quiet back roads on
the edge of the city (yes, there is an edge), and meandered down a surprisingly
pleasant 15-mile urban bike path connecting Scottsdale and Tempe. On Easter
Sunday I got out for a 5-hour ride around Rio Verde and I saw well over a
hundred cyclists on the roads. Some of them even talked to me, answering my
dumb questions and offering advice about where to cycle in and around the city.
It was all fine.
Scottsdale Bike Lane, with Bunny |
Though cycling in Scottsdale is a bit surreal. Wonderful roads, League
of American Bicyclists designation and all, sure, but everything is so unnaturally
green (for a desert) and eerily clean—a
little too immaculate and manicured for my liking, a sort of Singapore of the
Southwest. After a while there is a certain sterility to such well-groomed
landscape. Hanging out in Scottsdale did make me feel young though. The well-heeled white-hairs
dominate there; I felt a veritable whippersnapper in comparison. Scottsdale
also made me feel relatively poor. There is an obscene, if mostly tasteful,
display of wealth everywhere you look—the houses, the vehicles, the golf
courses. Plus everyone is white—the diversity of Tucson, or even of the ball
park in Tempe, makes for a startling contrast to Scottsdale’s white-bread
homogeneity.
I enjoyed my time cycling around Phoenix. It didn’t suck.
However, my sense is that Phoenix is a really big-ass city with some decent
cycling infrastructure (at least in Scottsdale) that happens to be home to a
lot of devoted cyclists. And devoted cyclists anywhere will always find places
to get out and ride. Tucson, however, is cozier, funkier, easier to get around,
has even better and more widespread cycling infrastructure, lots of riders—and the
all-important intangible factor: a
distinct and wonderfully wonky cycling vibe. Bike riding is a part of the very spandex
fabric of life for an awful lot of
Tucsonans. Maybe I didn’t go to the right places in Phoenix, but I didn’t get
that feeling.
When it comes to deciding who wins the battle of Arizona
cities, Phoenix gets a hearty pat on the back, but I have to raise the hand of
Tucson in victory.
I am glad to see Tucson retain the crown.
ReplyDeleteBut, in fairness, I don't think I said that the riding in Phoenix is unbearable, only that Tucson was superior. I've had some good rides out around Scottsdale, and, indeed, the Phoenix area probably has better mountain biking than Tucson by most measures.
As a place to visit or live, though, Phoenix does suck. It's an irredeemable nightmare of sprawling concrete, wasted water, and cloned strip malls. It is as though someone set out to copy all the worst aspects of Los Angeles' infrastructure just to see what would happen.
Word, Val.
DeleteGlad you had a good time, Jasper. I learned this weekend that there's some decent riding around Louisville, KY, especially along the Ohio River on the Indiana side. Consider adding it to the list! No adorable desert bunrabs, though--just lunatic grey squirrels.
ReplyDelete