At the Tour of Alberta Prologue, 2013. |
This has
been coming—in fact, has seemed inevitable—for a while. Government funding for
the event has been dwindling the last couple of years, and Alberta’s struggling
economy has meant that other sources of funding—corporate sponsorships,
community host fees—have been getting scarcer and scarcer. When the size of the
event shrank in 2016 and again in 2017, it was starting to look like the
beginning of the end.
Finger
pointers will be tempted to aim digits at the City of Calgary for failing to support
the T of A. Over the five-year existence of the race, exactly two stages were
held in the province’s largest city. This was obviously a problem, and a bit of
a baffler. Road cycling is probably bigger in Calgary than Edmonton, and
certainly a part of Calgary’s corporate culture. Yet city politicians and administration
weren’t interested in spending much money on the Tour.
(Edmonton,
meanwhile, did more than its share, getting behind the Tour from the get go,
hosting or being the finish for nine stages during that time. In addition,
numerous stages were held within an hour’s drive of the capital, drawing on the
support of Edmonton’s fan base.)
The Tour’s
failure to get any traction in tourist-packed Banff National Park will also go
down as a contributing factor. Arguably the most scenic roads in the province,
those around Banff, Lake Louise, and the Icefields Parkway, never made it into
a single stage over the event’s five years, making it difficult to claim that
the race showed off the best of the province.
But thinking
about the Tour of Alberta now that it’s gone, the surprising thing isn’t that
it folded; the remarkable thing is that it ever existed at all. The creation of
the Tour of Alberta back in 2013 was remarkably ambitious. The race was largely
the brainchild of former pro and Edmonton resident Alex Stieda, who dreamed it
up and fought for years to build the enormous support required to make an event
like this happen. His pitch was bold: Alberta has the stunning and diverse geography
for a short stage race; just get government funding by selling the race as a
way to promote tourism, especially to rural communities. Throw in Alberta’s
can-do spirit of volunteerism and support for major international events, and
voila! Easy as that.
Never mind
that much of the best mountain pavement in the province is located in National
Parks, which might not be willing to close roads for a bike race. Or that
government funding is notoriously unreliable. Or that there’s almost no culture
of bicycle riding, let alone racing, in those rural Alberta communities that
were going to form the backbone of the event. (Sorry, Devon.) And that even in
Edmonton and Calgary, bike racing is a fringe sport at best. Given these
formidable challenges, the Tour of Alberta was a crazy idea.
Yet, somehow,
despite those obstacles, Stieda and his gang made it all happen. They secured
the funding, found sponsors, and persuaded some big names to come to the race’s
kick-off. The fact that the Tour of Alberta ultimately didn’t stick, couldn’t
make it over the long run, just makes it the norm, really. History would
suggest that professional bike stage racing is a precarious business in North
America.
In fact, several
prominent North American stage races have ended up running for five years or so
and then dying for the same reason that the Tour of Alberta expired: lack of
money. The Tour of Georgia ran from 2003-2008. The USA Pro Cycling Challenge in
Colorado existed from 2011-2015. Even the breakthrough Coors Classic that ran
from 1980-88 in Colorado, during a boom in American road cycling, eventually
just ran out of money.
Today, the
Tour of California is the most successful of the current crop. California is an
ideal location. It’s got population density, stunning and diverse scenery, a
deep pool of rich corporate sponsors, and one of the strongest cultures of
cycling in America. It’s attracted top flight talent in recent years, becoming
a legitimate alternative to the Giro for many pros. But even with all that
going for it, if something were to happen to its support from title sponsor
Amgen, who knows if even the mighty T of C could survive?
Over the
years, I’ve offered my share of critical comments on the way the Tour of
Alberta was run, but I’ve always been in favor of the concept and have cheered
on the event every year. My criticism was always aimed at trying to make the
event better. Thinking back now over the last five years, I have many fond
memories of the Tour of Alberta.
I’ll never
forget the Prologue time trial in Edmonton for the inaugural Tour in 2013. Cycling
fans in Edmonton watched in amazement as some of the biggest names in bike
racing took to our streets. I stood on the side of the road watching high
profile riders like Cadell Evans, Peter Sagan, and Ryder Hesjedal, only a year
removed from his Giro victory. It was all a bit surreal.
A bunch of
little details stand out: Peter Sagan popping wheelies down the main street of
Devon; the look on Sagan’s face when he was presented with a bison-sculpture
lamp for winning a stage; the great Canadian Pave experiment of 2014, which
caused mayhem on the roads of Strathcona County but which Tom Dumoulin
pronounced “cool;” then Dumoulin losing the GC that year by mere seconds on the
final stage; scooping up discarded water bottles by Victoria Golf Course with
my kids; the muddy mix up in 2015, when pretty much the whole mud-spattered peloton
took a wrong turn in Parkland County, setting up a bizarre stage finish; spying
Team Jelly Belly out for an early morning ride on my regular south loop; the
velothon frenzies of 2016 and 2017, when so many weekend warriors—including a
few friends of mine—took over the course for a morning.
The Tour of
Alberta was a blast while it lasted. Rather than lament its demise, I choose to
celebrate its run. For five years, Alberta cycling fans got to watch pro bike
racing in our backyards. Not many Canadians--not many North Americans--can say that.
I loved that the Tour was here. I wish it could have lasted longer!
ReplyDelete