The student of nature has in the bicycle a very
serviceable friend.
I’ve got a special bookshelf devoted to my
favorite oddball classics of cycling literature. It includes copies of F.W
Bockett’s Some Literary Landmarks for Pilgrims on Wheels, J.W. Allen’s Wheel
Magic, and Charles Brooks’ A Thread of English Road, all works that
no-one could call “great” books--they’re too weird and uneven--but that are
nonetheless wonderful in some strange way.
That’s where I’d love to someday put a copy of
William S. Beekman’s Cycle Gleanings: or, Wheels and Wheeling for Business
and Pleasure and the Study of Nature (1894). I say someday because
it’s almost impossible to find extant copies of this book. I got to look at one
of the seven existing copies listed in the worldcat via interlibrary loan, but
good luck trying to acquire a copy for yourself. It’s rare and expensive (years
ago I saw a copy online going for $700), which makes it even more of a gem, if
you ask me.
The author William Beekman refers to himself as
a “chemist” and clearly has a science background, judging from his interest in
geology and astronomy. However, he’s more than just a science guy. Much more.
As the sub-title suggests, Beekman is also devoted to the study of Nature (with
a capital N), and he’s an avid photographer thereof, evidenced by the dozens of
(unfortunately low-quality) black and white landscape photos included in the
book. Plus he’s an ardent fan of poetry, modernity, and existential philosophy,
with a side interest in extraterrestrial life and what we might today call
theories of well being. Not your typical chemist.
But more than anything, Beekman loves bicycles
and bicycling. He makes the case that these machines are marvels of modernity
and that riding them can enhance our understanding and appreciation of Nature,
the cosmos, and ourselves. On this, he possesses the evangelical enthusiasm of
a true believer.
Cycling has become one of the features of higher
civilization, and consequently is ably supported by a constantly growing class
of vigorous, intelligent people.
Beekman wasn’t alone in this view. At the end of
the nineteenth century, before automobiles became widely used, bicycles were
seen by many as a revolutionary technology, one that could transform how humans
got to work, travelled, and played. It’s how Beekman explores this view that is
unusual, through a strange mixture of argument, dialogue, lecture, photos,
narrative, and sermon.
The structure of the book feels totally random.
It contains a mere 49 pages of text, consisting of eight chapters, some of them
polemics, making the case for the superiority of the bicycle (with subtitles
such as “An Improvement on Nature’s Legacy of Walking” and “The Importance of
the Wheel and Wheeling”); others are curious dramatic exchanges between “Mr. X,
Mr. Y., and Mr. Z,” reminiscent of Izaak Walton’s The Complete Angler,
in which the voices discuss astronomy, poetry, graveyard etiquette, aesthetic
theory, and the boundaries of the Seen and Unseen. Still others are almost
purely descriptive trip reports of journeys around New England. At the very
end, there’s a short piece called “How My Wife Learned to Ride a Bicycle,” by
Beekman’s friend Eric Allan. It’s got absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
the book and feels completely out of place.
The word “gleanings” in the title, though, is
perfectly apt, as amid all this curious jumble, the book is studded with some
lovely and memorable sentences and sentiments, nuggets that glimmer and shine
among the chaff of Beekman’s odd ramblings.
It [the bicycle] carries one into new fields, it
allows one to view the kaleidoscopic panorama of Nature’s face, as one will.
One of the most memorable chapters is a short
one called “The Cycling Seasons, When Nature Is at Its Best.” Beekman makes the
argument, not uncommon at the time, that riding a bicycle enables one to
experience Nature in a completely unique way. He claims that being astride a
bicycle gives one “a keener zest for beauty” and “a quickened spiritual
impulse.”
It is the cyclist who finds warmth in the
woodland paths that the ordinary tourist cannot maintain, nor the
carriage-driver approximate.
Beekman’s favorite season is spring, and he
believes that cyclists experience its wonders before, and more intensely, than
anyone else. His passion for firstness extends to his preference for
riding “during the very spring of the day” come the heat of summer--mainly
because morning is when one can smell all the best smells (wildflowers, mown
hay) of the natural world before they “are wafted away by the vibration of the
air.” Beekman is big on vibrations.
[T]he main object in riding should be to acquire
the habit of seeing all that forty miles can show, than to ride the hundred
with only the end in view.
A close second for Beekman is autumn, again
because of opportunities for experiencing Nature in her richest forms.
No one can enjoy the exhilaration produced by
the embraces of this life-extenuating air, or see more of the picturesque
grandeur of the country, enlivened by the still more beautiful foliage, whose
colors at a distance often resemble the unstudied effect of a palette,
belonging to some professional artist, than the touring cyclist.
Regardless of the season, cycling fosters
contemplation and a sense of perspective, Beekman insists. he conveys a
stronger attraction to the stars in the sky than to his fellow human beings.
Time and again, Beekman starts off talking about cycling and ends up pondering
the constellations, often sounding more like a poet than a scientist.
One can never be alone if acquainted with the
stars.
Beekman loves cycling at night, under the stars.
It’s a special form of the connection to Nature he says cycling allows.
He was writing during an era when “moonlight club runs” were surprisingly
common. Large groups of club cyclists would head out after dark, lead by a club
bugler, and using acetylene or carbide bicycle lamps to light the way, when the
moon wasn’t enough. Beekman fondly references such outings several times in the
book.
Fortunate, indeed, is the man who is gladdened
and inspired as he wheels along, communing with these wonderful mythological
deities.
Star cycling seems to fit Beekman’s personal and
cosmological sense of scale when it comes to calculating time and space: he
sees life in the context of geological epochs and galaxy-spanning distances.
Two chapters consist of trip reports from tours
in the New England area, but even these are unusual in that Beekman is an
unusually geological traveller, always commenting on undulations of the land,
the particular types of granite, notable erratics--those anomalous boulders
forgotten by glaciers. Words like tourmaline, beryl, and gneiss pop up with
regularity. But even at his most geological, the poet-philosopher-mystic in
Beekman emerges amidst the drumlins and eskers.
We cannot transcend experience. Of the future,
no problem taken from the finite world can foretell the Infinite, and we must
remain ignorant, because of the future we can only surely state that we know
absolutely nothing at present.
Don’t get me wrong. As much as I love it, this
book is super-weird. At times, I have no idea what Beekman is on about. But if
you can roll with that, you’ll find in this little book many little nuggets of
wisdom and poetry and beauty.
I mentioned at the beginning that it’s almost
impossible to find this book. I find it curious that it’s also exceedingly
difficult to find information about Beekman himself. For a writer who was so
interested in tracking historical traces across the land, it’s interesting that
Beekman and his book seem to have left so little for us to know him by--just a
few magazine articles, a couple of obscure documents and photographs on the web, and, of
course, his rare and precious volume of gleanings, a true erratic in every
sense of the word.
Cool, seems like a real Renaissance Man. "He sees life in the context of geological epochs and galaxy-spanning distances." Interesting side-bar: Beekman would have had no concrete concept of other galaxies. That discovery wouldn't happen for another 30yrs when Hubble correctly identified Andromeda as one. Previously, galaxies that were visible with the weaker telescopes of the era were thought of as nebulae or dust lanes residing in the one and only Milky Way galaxy -this, the last of the great "decenterings" of our cosmological view post Copernicus and Galileo.
ReplyDeleteWell! That's good to know. You're quite right about the terminology. Beekman talks about planets, stars, constellations, and the universe (what he calls the Seen and Unseen) but he never uses the term "galaxy" at all.
ReplyDeleteI am excited to be counted among Beekman's "growing class of vigorous, intelligent people." Can't wait to find and read this one some day!
ReplyDeleteI just found an original copy 1894
ReplyDelete